cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoU.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sectorwww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1379arrow-down16
arrow-up1373arrow-down1external-linkU.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sectorwww.cnbc.comcantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squareseralth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·14 hours agoHealthcare could help, that’s good socialism. Intel is profits and power and control for the sake of it. That’s bad socialism. That way when things fuck up they can point and go SEE SEE IT DOESNT WORK! WE TRIED IT AND IT MADE THINGS WORSE!! and if it somehow does manage to help or improve things they can now claim they did something smart and take all the credit.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 hours agoWell, no. In this case it’s probably Intel is collapsing I assume, and they’re the only CPU producer native to the US. It’d be a really bad thing strategically to let them fail, so they should be nationalized.
minus-squareiamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 hours agoYeah, but then poor people would use it.
Healthcare could help, that’s good socialism. Intel is profits and power and control for the sake of it. That’s bad socialism.
That way when things fuck up they can point and go SEE SEE IT DOESNT WORK! WE TRIED IT AND IT MADE THINGS WORSE!!
and if it somehow does manage to help or improve things they can now claim they did something smart and take all the credit.
Well, no. In this case it’s probably Intel is collapsing I assume, and they’re the only CPU producer native to the US. It’d be a really bad thing strategically to let them fail, so they should be nationalized.
Yeah, but then poor people would use it.