• hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are not complying with the law, if they were complying with the law they would be doing age verification and collecting everyone’s information in a masturbator base.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are not displaying content that requires age verification in those jurisdictions. That’s compliant.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Exactly, they are not doing the age verification. What would you have them do?

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not “having them do” anything, I’m saying that if you don’t serve content that requires age verification in jurisdictions where that content requires age verification then that’s complying with the law. That’s it.

          • hector@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            They came out against it publicly and then stopped providing their service rather than complying. I do not know what else you could ask of them. If that continued to provide pornography despite the law without the age verification they would face massive civil penalties that could get enforced through courts, and possible massive criminal penalties, and the prosecutors in those shit holy States would love it.

            I do not think the pouring companies have done anything wrong. None should contribute to the masturbator base. It is a betrayal of our freedom and should be recognized as such and met with contempt and ridicule.