In remarks tied to the UN week, Trump repeated the argument that Europe—and specifically Germany—turned back to traditional fuels after pursuing renewables, casting it as proof that rapid green transitions don’t work.
Getting to 95% non-nuclear renewable is relatively easy. It’s much harder to get that last 5%, but as you say, we don’t actually have to go to zero carbon emissions.
Yeah, I don’t see why this isn’t a good end goal. 95% non-nuclear renewable, including storage. Supposedly we can do this cheaper than the current grid and with today’s technology.
Would it really be so bad to have natural gas peaker plants for the rest? The problem is it’s not a consistent 5% but that 5% of the year and you can’t really keep up, assuming affordable renewables and storage buildout. Natural gas is good at powering up on demand, instead of wanting to be on continually.
So we’re still emitting carbon, but much much less than today. Maybe we can add it to the pile of things that will be tough to convert, like shipping, aviation, metal refining, plastics
Yeah, I don’t see why this isn’t a good end goal. 95% non-nuclear renewable, including storage. Supposedly we can do this cheaper than the current grid and with today’s technology.
Would it really be so bad to have natural gas peaker plants for the rest? The problem is it’s not a consistent 5% but that 5% of the year and you can’t really keep up, assuming affordable renewables and storage buildout. Natural gas is good at powering up on demand, instead of wanting to be on continually.
So we’re still emitting carbon, but much much less than today. Maybe we can add it to the pile of things that will be tough to convert, like shipping, aviation, metal refining, plastics