• Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The pieces of software the article mentions are:

    Meta – Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp
    
    Snap
    
    Tiktok
    
    YouTube
    
    X
    
    Roblox
    
    Pinterest
    
    Discord
    
    Lego Play
    
    Reddit
    
    Kick
    
    GitHub
    
    HubApp
    
    Match
    
    Steam
    
    Twitch
    

    Sketchy ID verification aside, I agree with everything except for GitHub and YouTube.

    YouTube is such a resource for DIY and learning, you just can’t ban kids from it, even if parts of it are sketchy. A restricted mode for kids would be better.

    GitHub is also a huge database of knowledge, important for being techy and computer literate, and doesn’t really even have much on the way of social features. Banning this would be asinine.

    I was initially against Steam, but then I realized that parents could still buy their kids games, and it’s probably better to force parents to take responsibility for that anyways.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Call me old, but I don’t think that under 16s should be allowed on a dating site even without an social media ban.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So far, I thought this was the norm. Dating apps are basically all 18+ here, although I did encounter kids posing as adults while I still used them

    • Master167@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I agree.

      Should a government be forcing this? I don’t think so. Especially if that requires providing personal information to the internet to enforce compliance.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Who but the government would enforce the law? Because if there is none, there is no reason for the dating app to self-limit their customer base. They might write “you have to be 18+ to use this app” in the T&Cs, but nobody could held them responsible if school kids hang out there with fictional birthdays.

  • brown567@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I mean, probably best to keep <16yos off dating apps…

    The rest of it, yeah. I heard Github is also possibly on the list? XD

    • shads@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      13 hours ago

      No silly you need to upload your drivers license to some shady 3rd party age verification service to protect 16 year olds from accidentally using dating sites.

      They even pinky promised to not store your data in some vibe coded system that will leak it all the first time a hacker so much as scans for api end points.

      Now stop asking questions and grant front camera permissions so our AI that is maybe 75% accurate cab guess your age.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Good. The vast majority of social media is corporate cancer and kids should have a chance to develop critical thinking skills before they start using it.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      btw you know she worked as a “government relations manager” for twitter, adobe and microshit before landing this job