I especially like how we are bending over and taking it from a Non-Profit so they can make more money.

Did what I could between Peter George and Rosalie Woodruff, but Dean Winter still got back in as did vice chairman Abetz.

As a state though we did the Australian Signature move of voting against our best interests. We aren’t quite as polarised as the US yet but I see people whinging about Leftists with disturbing regularity.

Plus the whole way through this stadium crap they have been calling anyone with even basic questions about the process an “Anti”. I always wanted to reply with Anti-Corruption, Anti-Crime, Anti-Bankruptcy. But most of those mouth breathers wouldn’t appreciate that sort of nuanced position.

Yeah, just look at Discord. Not only harvesting data, by sharing it with “trusted partners” I was told the Esafety commissioner can bring legal action to find companies up to $850k per offence for improperly storing Australian citizens data, but I haven’t heard anything about hundreds of millions in fines against Discord yet.

Just repaying the excess fees is “taking shareholder money”. No fines or penalties, just making the original customers whole.

Just make the entire executive team pay the money to the shareholders, problem solved. If they aren’t good for it I am sure they can get a line of credit extended to them, pretty sure they know some people in the banking industry.

So sick of people treating “white” as a racial group. I’m presumably about as white as you get (my father was adopted so no idea about his ancestry, but his bio mother appeared pretty damned white). I don’t identify with any of these little, insignificant man-children who are desperate for their hatefulness to make their lives just a little more important.

Plus if they could pull their heads out of their arses for a couple of minutes they would clearly see their grievances would be better directed along class lines, would make a far bigger difference in their lives than trying to pretend anyone with skin darker than weak custard is somehow oppressing them.

I especially liked this section from the ABC news story ( https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-17/verify-neo-nazi-rally-participant-visa-revoked/106018130 ) about this dickhead:

When ABC NEWS Verify asked Mr Gruter about the bracelet, and other matters, he responded: “Since when is it a crime to love and advocate for your own people?”

If he is so passionate about his own people, maybe he will get a warmer reception when he fucks off back to South Africa to rejoin them. Somehow I doubt it though.

So to maintain AI supremacy the US will now phase out all climate targets and begin the great AI vs Climate Collapse race.

People around the world will be on tenterhooks as they see AI get out to an early lead as politicians fire anyone who can call out the ever so subtle “Unprecedented Events”.

Gaze in wonder as climate strikes back by disrupting society with apocalyptic weather events to attempt supply chain disruption.

Watch in rapt disgust as the AI instructs the puppet like mouth pieces to pay lip service to citizens while doubling down on supply and logistic support while restricting the publics access to the same.

AI vs Climate Collapse: No matter who wins we lose

Over here in Australia the government is being told that the equivalent that we are having foisted on us lacks key supporting measures (like an equivalent of GDPR, actual hard and fast laws to penalise the misuse or failure to adequately secure citizens data, etc).

In spite of this and genuine commentary from children’s advocacy groups saying the legislation is not fit for purpose it is being steamrolled through because “won’t somebody think of the children”.

It does make me wonder how many children are going to be cut off from their support networks and escape routes that this might harm, potentially fatally. How much blood of Australia’s youth is our government willing to have on its hands so that our intelligence community (and we are part of five eyes so it doesn’t stay on our shores) can have a shiny new toy?

Now simply provide ID to every website or app that has any social interaction component, after all the only way to protect our children is to submit to a massive invasion of privacy.

What do you mean this runs the risk of hurting marginalised and or abused children who lose an avenue to seek help and guidance to escape or ameliorate their situation?

Stop understanding nuance and prepare for the line our intelligence community wants you to swallow instead.

In all seriousness if social media is too corrosive for young people maybe its time it was banned entirely, the reason for these half measures has little to do with children and their safety and everything to do with removing all privacy and anonymity from online activities.

I’ve been seeing these things on the Google News feed on my phone I keep disabling that keeps getting re-enabled for some mysterious reason. It’s literally gotten to the point lately that if something is presented as a fact by google I automatically disbelieve it. What really concerns me is the people who don’t take that stance.

Anyone using a Version Control system to do 3d design work, if I was smart I would be using this for the stuff I design to 3d print. But I’m not so I just have directories full of STL and 3MF files with occasionally somewhat descriptive names. Oh or 3d artists working on games, videos etc. People who are doing architectural design? Just people with other random interests? I suck at staying organised but I gave Forgejo a go and as long as you follow the getting started guide and keep it on an internal network its pretty straightforward to get started, complexity goes up if you are wanting to use it externally or in more co.plicated scenarios I believe.

Wow thanks for your contribution scammer.

Wow does your offer include Premium Netflix and Amazon Prime? Because the other scammers who are offering me IPTV are bundling Netflix and prime thanks to their exclusive relationships and I wouldn’t want to blindly hand my credit card details over to someone who can’t build exclusive (and implausible) relationships!

Having worked with confidential data for a cohort that included people with Protection orders we had it drilled into us that any mistakes could (and had) cost the company hundreds of thousands of dollars to remediate and that was with super specific tailored contracts to cover every contingency that the company had encountered in the past. That was 20 years ago. I can’t imagine those costs have diminished since then… The companies willingness to do everything to stay out of court and out of the headlines may have though.

As if any of this is about protecting children. At best that will be a side effect of the ban. It’s mainly about linking an ID to as much online activity as possible.

Discussions with the office of my representative showed that they are treating all the issues that will arise from this as secondary. When I asked if tax payer money would be used to redress the absolutely inevitable data breaches when they happen I was told the eSafety Commissioner has the power to bring legal action against companies that don’t implement best practise with regards to data security.

I asked where best practise was codified in legal terms and was then told that the government has published guidelines that state data gathered should be limited in scope and secured in a safe manner. In other words we are putting the horse so far in front of the cart it’s as though the horse is still in the stable.

When I asked about penalties I was told that companies could be fined up to 850k per offense. However when I asked what was to stop a company that had just accidentally leaked say a million drivers licenses from simply closing shop and abandoning Australia to deal with the fallout rather than accept an multi trillion dollar fine I just got some limp hand-wavey statements about how companies would be compelled by the rules and regulations.

I think the biggest problem facing the welfare system is decades of the Australian public having the recipients demonized as dole bludgers by populist shitbags. Every time I point out to my father that we give far more money in corporate welfare than we invest into people who are down on their luck I get the same tired bootstraps rhetoric. Taking support for aged pensions and family tax supplements out of the equation the actual amount we offer as support to people who can’t get a job through disability or lack of opportunity is an insult. If we taxed corporate entities and people squatting on virtual dragon hordes of property correctly the landscape would change.

Amateurs… here in Tassie we would just build between 3 and 6 stadiums with that sort of money. The hardest part would be finding enough hideously inconvenient spots that have insufficient infrastructure and potentially contaminated soil to site them. We know how to piss money we don’t have away on White Elephants down here.

It’s a ritual that we have a whiskey when I go to pay my rent. Couldn’t be nicer. It’s just hard to reconcile with some of the more irrational beliefs. Honestly my dad is worse in some ways, my dad would have been much happier if he was born 40 years earlier. Australian Society in the 50s would have been a lot more his pace.

I don’t know anyone else’s inner world obviously, but reading between the lines of what he said it sounds like that era of German history disrupted his family enough that there is no romanticisation going on.

Plus he told me about an occasion where he confronted some stupid teenager who decided to go to a nearby shopping centre in a reproduction Waffen SS uniform and rather forcefully told him to leave when the police said it was distasteful but they couldn’t do anything about it (before the bans on publicly showing Nazi iconography).

I think he is a standard Lib Nats voter that has the usual amount of mindrot from watching a bit too much SkyNews (more than 15 seconds qualifies as far as I am concerned).

Oh I got him to agree that the NSN should be openly repudiated by any of the “reasonable” people who were just there for every day run of the mill racism. He is one of those people who is “just using common sense”. He unfortunately is a fan of the Gish gallop and one of the biggest frustrations for both of us is that I kept tackling his arguments in order starting from the first.

Look I get it, he has worked hard (and I know he has that’s not just hyperbole) and feels indignant that this means he has to pay a larger share of tax than people who are not as financially sound as he is, and so some wannabe populist talking head telling him “Oh it’s all the immigrants soaking up the prosperity of the nation!” is compelling. When I pointed out that if we just taxed big business and big finance correctly he started to come around, before haring off down some other tangent.

Ultimately I think I will just have to avoid politics, bit awkward to be arguing with the person who decides if your lease gets renewed when it expires. But if it does come up I might just start throwing out figures for Fuel Tax Credits paid to mining companies, or tax avoidance by tech giants, or multi-millionaires and billionaires funding political action against the best interests of voters.