Outside a train station near Tokyo, hundreds of people cheer as Sohei Kamiya, head of the surging nationalist party Sanseito, criticizes Japan’s rapidly growing foreign population.

As opponents, separated by uniformed police and bodyguards, accuse him of racism, Kamiya shouts back, saying he is only talking common sense.

Sanseito, while still a minor party, made big gains in July’s parliamentary election, and Kamiya’s “Japanese First” platform of anti-globalism, anti-immigration and anti-liberalism is gaining broader traction ahead of a ruling party vote Saturday that will choose the likely next prime minister.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    At any point they can start giving people a UBI and they will have the option to quit their jobs and raise a family.

    The old ways of systemic slavery will not work as human societies progress, especially in our post scarcity world.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      I would personally consider it very shaky ground to found a family on if my ability to support them came in the form of a government stipend I have no direct control over.

      Can’t we instead restore the economy to functionality rather than slapping a big “UBI” patch on the big crack in the dam?

      Restoring earning power to the middle class such that a single income can support a household will give families the stability they need to start families with out handing over all the mechanisms of the economy to a single, potentially untrustworthy entity the way UBI does.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As the population ages out of the work force, and fewer replacements are coming in, where’s your tax base to support UBI? And if you say tax the rich, they won’t be rich long with no workers to leech off of.

      • sadfitzy@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If the disparity in wealth is reduced thanks to UBI and taxing the rich, then they can pivot towards taxing workers who will now have more money to pay said taxes.

        It literally does not make sense to avoid taxing the wealthiest citizens when the disparity in wealth is as bad as it is. Unless you’re an idiot.