• Hoimo@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think this is completely missing the point when it’s talking about “the minutiae of art”. It’s making two claims at the same time: art is better when you suffer for it and the art is good whether or not you suffered. But none of that is relevant.

    When Wyeth made Christina’s World, I don’t know if he suffered or not when painting that grass. What I do know is that he was a human with limited time and the fact that he spent so much of his time detailing every blade of grass means that he’s saying something. That The Oatmeal doesn’t draw backgrounds might be because he’s lazy, but he also doesn’t need them. These are choices we make to put effort in one part and ignore some other part.

    AI doesn’t make choices. It doesn’t need to. A detailed background is exactly the same amount of work as a plain one. And so a generated picture has this evenly distributed level of detail, no focus at all. You don’t really know where to look, what’s important, what the picture is trying to say. Because it’s not saying anything. It isn’t a rat with a big butt, it’s just a cloud of noise that happens to resemble a rat with a big butt.

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Visitor to your grave: “…I need more context.”
        Your ghost: “It’s about AI art.”
        Visitor: “…I still don’t get it.”
        Ghost: “That’s because you’re a robot. Everybody’s just robots now. Us ghosts are all that’s left of humanity. All that you know is based on what we suffered to learn and create.”
        Robot visitor: “…but why a rat with a big butt?”
        Ghost: “Draw one, and reflect on the cloud of noise that you produce instead.”
        Robot: *draws a rat with a big butt
        Ghost: “…AI wasn’t as good back then. Fuck you.” *whisps away