Obama’s take really does smack of bothsides-itis, and is a very clearly diplomatic approach to what was undeniably a one sided massacre. Ms Rachel is not wrong here.
And he doesn’t need to be political. He is free of any obligation. But he chooses to make a statement while his own country is going through a fascist militant take over.
The only reason would be he must got paid for this.
Obama’s take really does smack of bothsides-itis, and is a very clearly diplomatic approach to what was undeniably a one sided massacre. Ms Rachel is not wrong here.
And he doesn’t need to be political. He is free of any obligation. But he chooses to make a statement while his own country is going through a fascist militant take over.
The only reason would be he must got paid for this.