• Miaou@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    They’re the ecofascist yet you’re the one saying “you’ll shit in the mud and you’ll like it”.

    Birthrates lower partially thanks to higher standard of living, which are not sustainable for 7+ billions people.

    Not that I think LLMs are going to help in any way, but every time someone mentions overpopulation, all the counter arguments I see are loads of anti system rhetoric with nothing to show for it.

    You think soviet Russia was/current China is sustainable?

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The earth can easily sustain our current population at a 1st world standard of living, but only if we are orders of magnitude more efficient. That means things like no mass car usage, eco-urbanisn, no more single family homes with quarter acre empty lawns, widespread plant-based foods as the norm, and repairable technology that actually lasts decades instead of planned obsolescence and cheap plastic junk that fills up landfills.

      You don’t need to be some anarcho-primitivist/Ted Kaczynski wannabe living in a wooden shack with one set of clothes.

      Now is that viable in the current societal climate? No, people, especially Americans generally hate much of those eco-urbanist ideas. As long as Capitalism is the default economic system and neo-liberal politics is the default political approach to democracy, we will continue marching towards a consumerist doom.