• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    That article doesn’t say what you imply it does. Companies may be using ChatGPT to grow, but that doesn’t mean they are training AIs.

    And the distinction is critical to energy usage. Training a new AI uses a lot of energy. Querying an existing AI uses far less.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Companies may be using ChatGPT to grow, but that doesn’t mean they are training AIs.

      It’s the MAG7 that’s driving growth. And they’re all fixated on training AI in some capacity

      Training a new AI uses a lot of energy. Querying an existing AI uses far less.

      It costs $5 for each 10s video generation, based on Azure’s published rates for the first Sora model.

      That’s presumably a lot of energy.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The MAG7 operate large and growing cloud services, so their datacenter costs would grow even without any AI training.

        And charging $5 for a video query does not mean the query uses $5 of energy. The query is priced to recoup training costs that were already incurred.