geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 10 days agoNo Bernie and AOClemmy.mlimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1104arrow-down127
arrow-up177arrow-down1imageNo Bernie and AOClemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·9 days agohttps://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/maddow-democrats-snatch-defeat-from-the-jaws-of-victory-again-251763269645 He simply stated he wasn’t sure who could/should replace him.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·9 days agoChris Van Hollen? Rashida Tlaib? Like what is a progressive squad supposed to be if they advocate for Chuck Schumer instead of the "progressives"m
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·9 days agoThey’re literally not advocating for Schumer though smh
minus-squareyonderbarn@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·8 days agoRashida is house not senate
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·8 days agoSo Van Hollen. Even a mediocre figure like Elizabeth Warren is available.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/maddow-democrats-snatch-defeat-from-the-jaws-of-victory-again-251763269645
He simply stated he wasn’t sure who could/should replace him.
Chris Van Hollen? Rashida Tlaib? Like what is a progressive squad supposed to be if they advocate for Chuck Schumer instead of the "progressives"m
They’re literally not advocating for Schumer though smh
Rashida is house not senate
So Van Hollen. Even a mediocre figure like Elizabeth Warren is available.