• Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Person: “My opponent said ‘X’. Here’s why ‘X’ is wrong.”

      You: “You need to stop saying X, Person!”

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Person: ignores argument and tries to talk about something else

        You: “We need change the topic because you are right but this post is inconvenient to my narrative”

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m sorry, I actually can’t follow. Who ignored what argument? Where did I change the topic from what to what?

            • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              The video is a selective edit of a whole sentence that has been manipulated to make a popular politician say something despicable. If you add in the second half of his sentence then we can have an honest discussion. Until then, you have selectively edited the truth to spread a lie.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Go watch the video I linked first.

              Did you edit it to be that short before the sentence was complete creating the false narrative or did someone do that for you? If you did it yourself, can you explain why you edited it to be intentionally deceptive when Sanders was communicating the exact opposite idea from your claim?