There they will be FORCED to pick up a PENCIL and DRAW and WRITE POETRY, BY HAND!
“Nooooooo, I just wanted to write prompts to make shitty catgirl pictures!”
“You will draw a pretty flower or be shot.”
There they will be FORCED to pick up a PENCIL and DRAW and WRITE POETRY, BY HAND!
“Nooooooo, I just wanted to write prompts to make shitty catgirl pictures!”
“You will draw a pretty flower or be shot.”
But it is art; how are AI artists any different than a guy who’s like “Hmm, I know! I’ll take the ears of a cat and I’ll take girls and then give the girls those cat ears!”
They’re basically the same thing, but the AI artist is efficient; so called ‘real artists’ are basically cameras with a photoshop function. Yeah we’re all reaaally impressed you know how to take a mental photograph and then transcribe it to a page.
Yawn.
Stop glazing ‘real’ artists; they’re beginning to think they can actually produce. Maybe Van Gogh wouldn’t have needed to cut off an ear if he had ChatGPT; Da Vinci could’ve run test simulations of his inventions if he’d had the GPT (that’s how we in the biz call it now, the GPT); Michelangelo would’ve had all the time to help in ninja turtle duties AND complete the Sistine, Seventine AND Eightine chapels too if he’d had the GTP. AI’s Leonard of Vinci could’ve drawn Mona AND Lisa.
I think ChatGPT would have made it MORE likely. He probably would have cut off BOTH his ears if he had ChatGPT.