Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-12-01/Opinion - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org

For one month beginning on October 5, I ran an experiment: Every day, I asked ChatGPT 5 (more precisely, its “Extended Thinking” version) to find an error in “Today’s featured article”. In 28 of these 31 featured articles (90%), ChatGPT identified what I considered a valid error, often several. I have so far corrected 35 such errors.

  • passepartout@feddit.orgEnglish
    2·
    2 hours ago

    Yes and no. I have enjoyed reading through this approach, but it seems like a slippery slope from this to “vibe knowledge” where LLMs are used for actually trying to add / infer information.