• moonshadow@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    Someone might spin that up, but it feels unlikely. Github was always kinda subsidized as a power play on MS’s part, and now that it’s well established enough they’re squeezing it for ROI. An instance that doesn’t need your donations still needs resources to perpetuate itself from somewhere, I’d personally rather depend on infrastructure that was transparent about that (whether paid or donation based) than be treated as the product

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      Github was always kinda subsidized as a power play on MS’s part

      Github existed for like 10 years pre-microsoft. Though they did get an investment from Shitreessen Fuckwitz after a few years. Before that, they actually earned enough money on their own to keep the lights on.

      An instance that doesn’t need your donations still needs resources to perpetuate itself from somewhere

      I meant more that I’m willing to use an instance after it already has enough recurring donations OR paid users to sustain itself. Because at that point they don’t need to treat you as a product to save their own asses, nor are they likely to go bankrupt. So I meant the ironic part is that I’m willing to pay, but for an instance that’s doing well enough that it doesn’t desperately need my money to keep the lights on.