So, somebody recently asked me to do a Marxist–Leninist reading of the conservative-left party Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) the party is currently still operating under that name, though a potential rebranding is expected. I am half German, so I figured I would write a short, factual overview of what the party is, where it comes from, and how it positions itself.
We can discuss theory and critique in the comments afterward.
Quick Summary
- The” BSW” was created as a splinter group from “Die Linke”.
- Die Linke” itself is also the product of earlier mergers and splits in German left politics.
- The party was initially founded and led by Sahra Wagenknecht, but this was or is about to change.
- Wagenknecht is married to Oskar Lafontaine, former SPD leader and prominent figure in Die Linke. She grew up in the GDR and is half-Iranian.
- In the European Parliament, BSW sits with the Unified European Left (UEL), not GUE/NGL.
Sahra Wagenknecht: Background & Profile
Sahra Wagenknecht is one of the most prominent figures in German politics, known for her mix of left-leaning economic positions and culturally conservative messaging.
- ** Early life & ideology:**
Born in the GDR to an East-German mother and Iranian father, she entered the PDS (the post-SED party) in the early 1990s. Her early writings were more traditionally Marxist, though her later positions diverge sharply from orthodox Marxism.
- Career in Die Linke:
Served as Bundestag representative, economic spokesperson, and co-chair of the parliamentary faction. She became known for criticizing neoliberal reforms and EU austerity.
- Internal conflicts:
Repeated disputes with other factions of Die Linke, especially over migration, cultural politics, and foreign policy, led to her eventual split.
- Public image:
Combines left-wing economic rhetoric with conservative cultural critiques. Highly media-savvy and frequently on talk shows. She also writes a lot of books.
- Personal ties:
Her marriage to Oskar Lafontaine further ties her to older social-democratic and post-communist political networks.
The BSW: Ideological & Policy Profile
The BSW positions itself as a party for “social justice, economic stability, and common sense,” blending social-democratic economics with socially conservative themes.
- Economic Policy
Strongly interventionist; supports state regulation and higher taxes on the wealthy. Critical of privatization; favours re-municipalization of key services. Focus on cost-of-living issues, housing, and industrial decline. Pro-industrial strategy but anti-corporate in rhetoric.
- Social & Cultural Policy
Rejects identity politics and “lifestyle leftism.” More restrictive migration stance than most European left parties. Emphasis on social cohesion, stability, and communitarian values.
- Foreign Policy
Critical of NATO and U.S. foreign policy. Opposes weapons deliveries to Ukraine, favours negotiations and sanctions relief. Seeks restoration of economic ties with Russia (while officially condemning the invasion). Sceptical of deeper EU integration.
- Environmental Policy
Supports climate goals but rejects consumption bans and “eco-austerity.” Emphasizes technological investment over regulatory restrictions.
Controversies, Local-Level Behaviour & Criticism
- Local gains but conservative cooperation:
While BSW has achieved notable success in eastern state elections, it often cooperates with conservative or centrist parties at the local/state level, which critics view as inconsistent with its left-economic message .
- Strong anti-“woke” stance:
The party sharply criticizes identity politics, gender policies, and cultural liberalism. This appeals to certain working-class voters but alienates much of the traditional left.
- Accusations of pro-Kremlin alignment:
Opponents argue its Ukraine and NATO positions echo Russian narratives. These are political allegations; the party denies them, and verified evidence of Kremlin funding is lacking.
-
There was some suspicion on who funded the party , German news and donation watch list one family (listed as Thomas Stanger) that donated millions to the party.
-
Backlash over Ukraine-related remarks:
Wagenknecht has faced criticism for comments perceived as overly sympathetic to Russia or dismissive of Ukrainian concerns, though some viral claims are unverified or misrepresented.
The BSW is not a Marxist–Leninist party, nor does it claim to be its program is reformist, populist, and firmly within the framework of capitalist parliamentary politics.
Anyways, if you find something that is incorrect pls feel free to correct me. Also leave your comments and thoughts below.
N.B: This is in no way to promote this party. This post is more about informing people about it and critically discussing issues arising from such parties.


LGBTQ people are a part of the working class. The working class is not some monolith devoid of queer people. Their liberation should be supported. Internationally queer people represent a significant portion of the working class demanding liberation, and I don’t imagine this isn’t true in Germany of all places.
I’m not German and do not understand the context of BSW and Die Linke’s differences in terms of supporting LGBTQ rights beyond this and other things I’ve read, but does BSW meaningfully oppose or de-emphasize LGBTQ liberation?
As said before the BSW does not oppose LGBT rights. But the BSW is a working class party, not a LGBT party. The priorities should be obvious. Pandering to any kind of minority is how liberals do politics. Nothing we should copy. Again just look at China as an example.
“Wow go fuck yourself” is my immediate response and I think naturally the response of any other working class person who also happens to be queer. Clearly there needs to be significant political upheaval in Germany, but you’re fucking stupid if you think that abandoning a significant and politically active section of your class is liberal or anything other than a stupid idea.
The reason that liberation is a critical part of any socialist program is because when workers face special oppressions, they become easier to exploit, lowering wages and conditions for all workers. Also, when you work towards the liberation of large sections of your class who face special oppression (transphobia, Islamophobia, etc) then you gain their trust. This is why national liberation is key.
Also you don’t live in China you asshole, you live in fucking Germany. China has critical lessons but you do not fucking live in China and you’re clearly not learning the right ones.
Go fuck yourself
The world is not coloured in black and white. The purpose of a communist movement is to build socialism and a dictatorship of the working class first and foremost. Claiming anything else is revisionism.
No one is arguing against LGBT rights. No one is being abandoned. All you’re doing is making empty false accusations.
Your claims are unsubstantiated too. Supporting LGBT rights has not revived any communist movement in the world thus far. And it won’t. Actually building working class mass movements will.
You’re the one who can go fuck themselves for being a raging liberal. You’re no Marxist.
Literally who are you going to win over while talking like this lmao. Have like literally one gay friend who can explain how weird and gross your attitude is in real life please because I want you to win, genuinely, but this is an incredibly coddled view to have.
One should be smart in how they present themselves and their movement to different sections of the working class, of course, but your analysis and presentation belies fundamental misunderstandings of why queer liberation was even focused on in the first place and would be alienating for anyone from my background. Idk what to say to you bro except I invite you to try this and when you fail take the lessons humbly.
The differences between BSW and Die Linke are unfortunately much bigger than just their disagreement on cultural wedge issues and identity politics. Die Linke is now very strongly pandering to the base of the Greens, refuses to abandon liberal Zionism, and has fully embraced the pro-Ukraine narrative. After the split with BSW they are now firmly in the pro-EU liberal-left.
That makes sense; however, doesn’t answer my question in regards to LGBTQ liberation
I don’t know if they actively oppose it, some probably do, and Wagenknecht herself falls on the more conservative side, but as a party they definitely de-emphasize it.
I also think that opinions differ within the party itself with some being significantly more conservative on this issue than others. Some see it as opposing the way that liberal parties are hyper focusing on identity issues to avoid dealing with class issues, others i think just have a reactionary position, at least on the gender part if not so much the sexuality party.
One of their leaders answers a question on this topic here: https://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/profile/fabio-de-masi/fragen-antworten/wie-stehen-sie-zu-lgbtq
Some parts of his answer are ok others are pretty problematic and play into right wing clichés and unscientific talking points. I don’t know how representative he is of the party as a whole, but given his position he is probably at least somewhat reflective of their overall views.
Of course this is disappointing to see in a party that describes itself as being on the left (and economically i would say they are), and that has a mostly correct anti-imperialist stance, which is very rare in Germany.
As you said:
It’s really as simple as that.