So, somebody recently asked me to do a Marxist–Leninist reading of the conservative-left party Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) the party is currently still operating under that name, though a potential rebranding is expected. I am half German, so I figured I would write a short, factual overview of what the party is, where it comes from, and how it positions itself.
We can discuss theory and critique in the comments afterward.
Quick Summary
- The” BSW” was created as a splinter group from “Die Linke”.
- Die Linke” itself is also the product of earlier mergers and splits in German left politics.
- The party was initially founded and led by Sahra Wagenknecht, but this was or is about to change.
- Wagenknecht is married to Oskar Lafontaine, former SPD leader and prominent figure in Die Linke. She grew up in the GDR and is half-Iranian.
- In the European Parliament, BSW sits with the Unified European Left (UEL), not GUE/NGL.
Sahra Wagenknecht: Background & Profile
Sahra Wagenknecht is one of the most prominent figures in German politics, known for her mix of left-leaning economic positions and culturally conservative messaging.
- ** Early life & ideology:**
Born in the GDR to an East-German mother and Iranian father, she entered the PDS (the post-SED party) in the early 1990s. Her early writings were more traditionally Marxist, though her later positions diverge sharply from orthodox Marxism.
- Career in Die Linke:
Served as Bundestag representative, economic spokesperson, and co-chair of the parliamentary faction. She became known for criticizing neoliberal reforms and EU austerity.
- Internal conflicts:
Repeated disputes with other factions of Die Linke, especially over migration, cultural politics, and foreign policy, led to her eventual split.
- Public image:
Combines left-wing economic rhetoric with conservative cultural critiques. Highly media-savvy and frequently on talk shows. She also writes a lot of books.
- Personal ties:
Her marriage to Oskar Lafontaine further ties her to older social-democratic and post-communist political networks.
The BSW: Ideological & Policy Profile
The BSW positions itself as a party for “social justice, economic stability, and common sense,” blending social-democratic economics with socially conservative themes.
- Economic Policy
Strongly interventionist; supports state regulation and higher taxes on the wealthy. Critical of privatization; favours re-municipalization of key services. Focus on cost-of-living issues, housing, and industrial decline. Pro-industrial strategy but anti-corporate in rhetoric.
- Social & Cultural Policy
Rejects identity politics and “lifestyle leftism.” More restrictive migration stance than most European left parties. Emphasis on social cohesion, stability, and communitarian values.
- Foreign Policy
Critical of NATO and U.S. foreign policy. Opposes weapons deliveries to Ukraine, favours negotiations and sanctions relief. Seeks restoration of economic ties with Russia (while officially condemning the invasion). Sceptical of deeper EU integration.
- Environmental Policy
Supports climate goals but rejects consumption bans and “eco-austerity.” Emphasizes technological investment over regulatory restrictions.
Controversies, Local-Level Behaviour & Criticism
- Local gains but conservative cooperation:
While BSW has achieved notable success in eastern state elections, it often cooperates with conservative or centrist parties at the local/state level, which critics view as inconsistent with its left-economic message .
- Strong anti-“woke” stance:
The party sharply criticizes identity politics, gender policies, and cultural liberalism. This appeals to certain working-class voters but alienates much of the traditional left.
- Accusations of pro-Kremlin alignment:
Opponents argue its Ukraine and NATO positions echo Russian narratives. These are political allegations; the party denies them, and verified evidence of Kremlin funding is lacking.
-
There was some suspicion on who funded the party , German news and donation watch list one family (listed as Thomas Stanger) that donated millions to the party.
-
Backlash over Ukraine-related remarks:
Wagenknecht has faced criticism for comments perceived as overly sympathetic to Russia or dismissive of Ukrainian concerns, though some viral claims are unverified or misrepresented.
The BSW is not a Marxist–Leninist party, nor does it claim to be its program is reformist, populist, and firmly within the framework of capitalist parliamentary politics.
Anyways, if you find something that is incorrect pls feel free to correct me. Also leave your comments and thoughts below.
N.B: This is in no way to promote this party. This post is more about informing people about it and critically discussing issues arising from such parties.
I agree that the BSW is highly problematic. For me supporting communist parties like the DKP is the way to go, even if they’re small. You have to start somewhere. You can’t rely on socdems and bourgeois electoral politics.
I don’t agree that supporting Die Linke is any better. I think they have a dead end political strategy and economic policies that are little more than socdem wishful thinking without a broader, systemic reorientation of the direction of the economy. And that economic reorientation won’t be possible without a complete reversal of the current foreign policy direction.
The deindustrialization crisis is directly tied into the failure of the energy policy and the sanctions policy. Die Linke completely refuses to see this and continues to insist on sanctions against Russia and a Russia-hostile foreign policy. They say they are for peace and oppose increasing the military budget but they lean into the “Russia threat” tropes which are used to justify the re-militarization. This is all money which is taken away from social programs that Die Linke claims to want to support and expand.
Their China policy is muddled and practically nonexistent, even though China is now the most important German trading partner and any serious national party needs to formulate a coherent position and strategy on such an important issue. Die Linke seems to prefer to not even engage with the topic since their members are either split or solely interested in domestic and European issues. This matters because Europe and Germany’s green transition is not possible without Chinese production, yet Europe continues to impose protectionist tariffs on Chinese EVs and green tech.
And finally, they refuse to see that the EU is headed toward a dead end and probably collapse. Die Linke lives in the 2010s. That time has passed and it’s not coming back. The utopian pan-European liberal project has failed. And Atlanticism is an anchor dragging Europe down into the abyss.
honestly after typing that i wanted to retract my statement lmao. my mind was fixated on their tax policy and completely forgot the reasons you mentioned
As i said, their economic and social policies are socdem wishful thinking. If you look at each individual policy, proposal and position in isolation they sound good.
They sound like something leftists, even communists, should support. It’s good to demand more worker protections, more social spending, higher taxes on the rich and on corporations, etc. Even if these are bandaid solutions that don’t solve the systemic problem of capitalism, harm reduction is still good, right?
The problem is that in the current situation not even these social democratic policies can be implemented. The direction we are going in is a dismantling of the social democratic welfare state, because in the current declining economic situation they can’t be supported simultaneously with a policy of rearmament and massive military and financial aid to Ukraine.
So when Die Linke calls for all of these things while pretending like it’s still 2012 and Germany has a strong economy, and everything in Europe is stable, without talking about the Nordstream sabotage, without talking about the European energy crisis, without a plan to reverse course on the Ukraine policies, it sounds i’m sorry to say like they are living in a fantasy world.