“You can’t trust the Chinese people themselves, because a right wing western propaganda outlet says something different!”

Again, I’m not saying that. There’s a difference between relying on the feelings of random poll responders and determining something based on specific criterias challenging facts. Present a pro-China source doing the latter and you’ve got an argument.

Yeah, nothing biased about this sentence,

The bias is the point. My entire point there is that people with different perspectives have different opinions. My perspective shapes my bias, which shapes my opinion. Same applies to everyone else. My perspective is a bit extreme, so similarly my opinion is a bit extreme too.

Like how you think you live in a country “that ensures the people are effectively the highest power in the country.”

Well, that is the case. Switzerland lets its people freely launch binding votes to modify the constitution (to which the government is held) and veto laws via referendums. This makes the people effectively the highest power, as they can control what the government can do and also have the last say on any law they try to pass.

Bahaha. Yeah, sure mate. Unlike those irrational orientals, those perfect icons of rationality at the Economist are able to create a metric for measuring “Democracy” that it pure fact, no feelings or perceptions involved. And what do you know, it just happens to give the exact result that aligns with ideology they already held! Yes, the Chinese people may think they know what they think, but they’re too underdeveloped to know their own thoughts, we need enlightened western pundits for that.

I really don’t think you’re getting my argument correctly. And no, I don’t think you know even if you claim you do.

You keep trying to make this about chinese vs western when that’s not my point at all.