Absurd, idiotic headline. Apart from being pure slander of the Soviets, the whole premise vulgarizes socialist economic theory and what economic planning even means. The more i read from Varoufakis the more i’m beginning to think he’s really a moron.

He thinks he’s so clever coming up with these comparisons, with nebulous concepts like “neofeudalism”, as if he’s just discovered something completely new that no one discovered before, when all it is, is just monopoly capitalism. All to avoid applying a good old fashioned Marxist analysis which is more than enough to explain these phenomena without resorting to estoteric theories about a new “feudalism”.

The more you read him and others like him the more you start noticing the conspicuous, Marxism-shaped hole in their analysis. Because of course we can’t be seen to be talking in Marxist terminology and applying dialectical analysis can we? That wouldn’t be respectable, our liberal academic peers would call us names…

The result of this Marxism-phobia is that he has to vomit up onto the page sentences like:

So, just as the Soviet Union generated one kind of feudalism in the name of socialism and human emancipation, today, Silicon Valley is generating another kind of feudalism — technofeudalism, I have called it — in the name of capitalism and free markets.

No, you pretentious wannabe, the Soviet Union was not “feudalism” and neither is monopoly capitalism.

Idk why anyone ever thought this guy, who is clearly an anti-communist radlib, had anything intelligent to say.

  • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    25 days ago

    corpos do centrally plan a lot, and they eat shit (sears) when they don’t.

    would be much better to bring that up as a defense of doing central planning on a nation-state level. calling the SU feudal is bonkers.

    • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      25 days ago

      How it’s even debatable that large systems benefits from planning is mind boggling.

      And I do think he actually believes that capitalism would be better without central planning given that’s a big part of the Valve flat hierarchy myth. The obvious insight is that Valve is not a large systems, it’s hugely profitable by extracting surplus value produced by workers in other companies. There there is less need for planning at Valve.