• pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Rego is weight-based, but it’s utterly fucked.

    My 900kg hatchback costs $149 more to register than a ute up to 4500kg out in the country.

    In the city, the rego difference is $1.10.

    https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/registrations/fees-and-charges/vehicle-fees#registration-renewal-fees-for-light-motor-vehicles

    What’s worse, their FAQ says a lot of TAC claims for utes are paid by workcover, not the TAC. That’s why it’s cheaper.

    …so people who purchase a roadblimp to use for school dropoffs are dodging the TAC charge, whilst being a much larger hazard than everyone else.

    https://www.tac.vic.gov.au/about-the-tac/our-organisation/transport-accident-charge?drop=6

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Canberra charges based on emissions category, with EVs being cheapest to register, and big engine diesels being the most expensive

      They are categorised by their CO2 emissions in g/km, so the big and least efficient pay much more

      News article, as the ACT government doesn’t seem to publish the details in an easy to read format

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        As a Victorian I am loathe to say it, but this is definitely one thing you guys do a hell of a lot better than us.

        Especially with the uptake in EVs, which while better for the environment long-term also pose a similar issue for pedestrians and cyclists, registration costs need to be reviewed and rethought from the ground up.

        • Salvo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          They need to break it down to a Road Levy and a Fuel Levy.

          A 2.5T Tesla Model X should pay more for road maintenance than a 900kg Suzuki Swift.

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            In the long-term, absolutely, we will need to revisit the fuel levy as we transition towards more EVs.

            However I think it would be short-sighted to do anything currently that could disincentivise EV uptake.

            I’d honestly much rather see a 1,000 more Model Ys on the road than 100 Rangers.

            • Salvo@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I would rather see more trains on railway tracks and buses with rational routes that service everyone than a single Tesla.

              • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                Oh, absolutely - we’re on the Pakenham line and took the trip through the new metro tunnel last weekend, absolutely brilliant!

                But there are trips and roles that can’t rely on PT, and for those I would much rather see EV adoption over more gigantic Yank-tank “trucks” with somehow less bed-space than what the Commodore and Falcon used to offer.

                • Salvo@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Yeah, I find it hilarious when I see a RAM that is actually being used by a tradie, with two Rhino Boxes and a short stack of Milwaukee PACK-OUTs taking up all the space in the tray, while a Triton parked next to it has an entire workshop of tools.