• Dave@lemmy.nzM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2か月前

    Even easier, they don’t have to change the threshold, worse case scenario they just wait, a larger and larger proportion will be above $200k each year due to inflation and wage growth.

      • Dave@lemmy.nzM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2か月前

        Wage growth historically is higher than inflation! It’s why National (or was it Act?) promised to index NZ Super to inflation - because inflation is generally lower than wage growth and Super was already indexed to wages. People vote for it because it sounds good even though it’s actually worse.

        From what I can find, inflation long term sits a little under 2% with wage growth sitting a little over 2% per year. The last few years are bad measuring sticks though.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2か月前

          I wonder what the distribution of that what growth is over the wave range.

          My cynical suspicion is that most of that growth is at the upper end… I.e. the people at the low end, most affected by inflation, don’t keep up.

          • piwakawakas@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2か月前

            I suspect you’re right. When we bargain (healthcare decay) we get percentage increases. So people on a higher wage get a larger increase than those on a lower.

          • Dave@lemmy.nzM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2か月前

            I think a good way to test this is to look at minimum wage.

            Since 1997, when minimum wage was $7, it has grown to $23.15 in 2024 (sorry, the data I used only went to 2024 and I didn’t think to grab the 2025 number).

            The “average” here is 4.9% per year. I use “average” in quotes as it’s the value needed each year to reach the end number (the Compound Annual Growth Rate), not actually an average. I used this calculator: https://cagrcalculator.net/