Since yesterday, Jordanlund is continuing to remove reporting like that from the reputed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_Site_News (article depicted in the screenshot is https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/israeli-spy-yoni-koren-stayed-jeffrey-epstein-apartment-ehud-barak) just for being hosted with substack. He is now moderating World News and Politics at lemmy.world.

Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don’t allow those links either.

goodness, that is not the point. That means these outlets post to their own website while also reposting the thing on twitter. In so many cases, their own website uses substack/wordpress! For example, https://time.com/ is the official website of Time magazine, as in the publisher of Time Person of the Year. It uses WordPress, as you can see by going to https://time.com/wp-admin/.

If he wants to target blogspam, he should be targeting things like The Daily Beast and https://www.utubepublisher.in/, which use none of the technologies he’s targeting. This ban on CMS technology is arbitrary and does not prevent poor publishing that simply registers a domain, as anyone may register a domain.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh, no, I don’t hate the users in general. There are SPECIFIC users I hate, like that one asshole who comes out of nowhere with a new account, posts a dozen times, and deletes their account over and over and over again.

    I would say, of the mod actions I take, maybe 1 in 100 becomes a problem? Most people either take it like a grown up and move on with life or actually apologize and do better.

    But man, that 1 in 100…

    • Wren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I find it difficult to hate anyone one here. We’re all just trying to make sense of the world. I share stories of the small minority with my drama loving friends, so it’s a positive in the end.

      In this situation, it’s an obviously engaged user who genuinely wants to know more. I like people who are passionate about something enough to not only spend energy thinking about it, but think about ways to improve things. Those are valuable users who shouldn’t be dissuaded from sharing their ideas.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Speaking of that 1 in 100… PM tonight… Dude had a comment removed for referencing a “final solution”, another mod banned them, I get this:

        • Wren@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t know what you’re trying to say here. That people suck on the internet? You do get that we’re all in this cursed place together, right?

          I’m not gonna pull a “eat because starving kids in Africa” because folks who threaten to burn down someone’s house are a bad time for everyone, but I’ve been getting rape threats since I was on the internet. You get shit for being a mod, half the population gets shit for being women. We all get shit for some reason or another.

          That person sucks and that situation sucks but you don’t have my sympathy for it.