I know there’s a significant anti-AI presence here. I’m not promoting it. I found it interesting to read how it was used, it’s strengths and limitations.
I know there’s a significant anti-AI presence here. I’m not promoting it. I found it interesting to read how it was used, it’s strengths and limitations.
This is what it’s supposed to be used for. Things like this are where LLMs are a benefit to society. The ability to “intelligently” process incredible amounts of information fast lends itself to things like this. Or helping Air Traffic controllers do their often hectic jobs, or sifting though the trillions of gigabytes of data that come in from space telescopes looking for anomalies, etc… etc… etc…
THAT would make me excited about AI. More…of…this…
But instead they use it make people even more lazy, and make corporations able to make billions more by firing real humans.
Yeah, but have you considered that this kind of technology can’t sustain the delusion idea that you could replace all workers with a chatbot?
Note this isn’t an LLM.
I was about to say. Couldn’t imagine an LLM would be great at stuff like this.
Yeah, this is right up machine vision alley, and is a pretty straightforward and good thing in general. It lets computers look through haystacks that humans just would take forever to get through. A thoroughly attentative human may do as well, if not better, given enough time, but it takes a lot of time and a human will burn out before reviewing that much imaging.
Dear God please do not let any of the current iterations or any of the next or even the ones after that of an llm anywhere near an air traffic controller tower. Fucking swear to God we will have planes smashing into each other when they start hallucinating their asses.
Oh, believe me. I agree. But this is what they SHOULD be working towards improving LLMs for, NOT better ways to steal art.
LLMs are not decision makers. Use a different model type if that’s what you need. LLM’s best aspect is their language interpretation, it doesn’t do much else