Once you’ve traded your principles for proximity to power, do you even run your own company?
Archived version: https://archive.is/20260109213037/https://www.theverge.com/policy/859902/apple-google-run-by-cowards
Once you’ve traded your principles for proximity to power, do you even run your own company?
Archived version: https://archive.is/20260109213037/https://www.theverge.com/policy/859902/apple-google-run-by-cowards
Why won’t X be held liable for distribution of child pornography?
Pedophile in chief probably personally intervened.
Manufacturing consent is the name of the game. The bottom line is money, nobody gives a FUCK.
System of a Down - Boom!
4,000 hungry children leave us per hour from starvation, while BILLIONS are spent on BOMBS
CREATING DEATH SHOWERS
You can’t blame a computer for what it does. Only the user who asks for the content is to blame. /s
According to this article it doesn’t actually put out porn or child porn. It’s gross but not porn. Relevant text:
“Nonconsensual AI-generated images of women in bikinis spreading their legs, and of children with so-called “donut glaze” on their faces”
I couldn’t even get it to output nudity
I think it’s disgusting that X probably doesn’t see a problem with it, but it still wouldn’t be legally classified as CSAM, no?
In some places it is CSAM and in others it is being working into convert into law.
I think the issues are:
deleted by creator