• Waryle@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    But will Fusion ever be cheaper than solar?

    Will solar with interseasonal storage ever be even feasible?

    People like to throw LCOE around, occulting that running countries with solar (and wind) power is plain science-fiction and nowhere close to change, while nuclear (at least fission) is empirically proven to work reliably, even for cheap, costing less than 200 billions of euros in the span of 60 years in France for example.

    When you don’t have enough sun (or wind), you either have sufficient backup in hydro or solar, or you burn coal and gas.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      my take is that 1. you don’t need equal supply year-through because big consumers should be able to sleep and reduce their energy intake in the winter. yes i know that is complicated, but sleep is also complicated in nature and evolution still pulled through with it because it does pay off in the long term.

      secondly, storage can also be renewable biomass. i have some napkin math sitting around somewhere on my disk that says that about 5% of the yearly energy demand can be covered with basically non-cost “waste” biomass that’s basically being burned to get rid of it today. I actually wanted to write a longer post about it in the !bathtubthoughts@discuss.tchncs.de community, i just couldn’t figure out how to properly present my calculations yet.