like the actual story is just some boomer complaining about people practicing unsafe food sex. the headline is a little misleading. “raw-dogging $4 baked potatoes” because they can’t afford the $5 condoms, but that’s based on one misleading quote from near the end. the entire inflation angle is the post’s editorial slant.
like the actual story is just some boomer complaining about people practicing unsafe food sex. the headline is a little misleading. “raw-dogging $4 baked potatoes” because they can’t afford the $5 condoms, but that’s based on one misleading quote from near the end. the entire inflation angle is the post’s editorial slant.