• ranzispa@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Creating an id check does increase the risk, it would be an additional attack surface.

    Social media may be dangerous, but I feel it should be supervised by the parents and that the government should provide the parents with good tools to supervise them. I do not like the idea of having websites being able to verify my identity, if it were to come to that I’d hope it would be for something more reasonable than protecting children from social media. I may prefer outlawing social media altogether at that point.

    • aka_@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The id check already exists, they’re just planning on forcing social media companies to go through it.

      In an ideal world social media would be decentralized and free of commercial purposes, just a public square. The stuff these people offer wrapped in social media is highly addictive, that’s basically where all the internal R&D goes.

      My point is, I really doubt banning social media is democratically viable. It would get revoked shortly. Best thing we can realistically do is put in place the usual barriers and limitations we have developed over the years for other similar products and services: age, disclaimers, taxation, fines, and so on.