While I generally agree with questioning the status of isnotreal and its “citizens” I don’t think Tucker is the mouthpiece for “progressive” talking points.
While it is from an obnoxiously xenophobic “America first” perspective, at least Tucker does seem to believe Israel should not be able to buy all American politicians and dictate what they do in office. It’s incredibly sad that this does position him better than most political pundits in the US. Calling this progressive is a stretch though, it’s just objective views on reality and what it means to be a sovereign nation.
While I generally agree with questioning the status of isnotreal and its “citizens” I don’t think Tucker is the mouthpiece for “progressive” talking points.
Tucker does a lot better than most “progressive” interviewers when it comes to Palestine
While it is from an obnoxiously xenophobic “America first” perspective, at least Tucker does seem to believe Israel should not be able to buy all American politicians and dictate what they do in office. It’s incredibly sad that this does position him better than most political pundits in the US. Calling this progressive is a stretch though, it’s just objective views on reality and what it means to be a sovereign nation.
Tucker is 90% likely bribed by Qatar but in this case I do not care go Tuckerman go.
True, but it’s really sad that we’re looking at Tucker Carlson - of all people - in 2026 and being like “no seriously, hear him out, he’s got a point”
It’s devastating.