• Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      We’ll just continue to make our own internet with blackjack and hookers. Too much knowledge is already out.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            What’re the data rates like on meshtastic and ham? Wasn’t looking great when I briefly looked at it.

            • gnuthing [they/them]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Meshtastic uses LoRa, so slow speeds but far distance. A better choice is reticulum, this combines LoRa, Wifi HaLow, Wifi 2.4 & 5 GHz and BLE together into one network stack. So in a city we could have faster data speeds all sharing WiFi and rural areas that currently need satellite we could have a connection over far distances wirelessly. Reticulum is also encrypted, meshtastic is not

            • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I mean they’re not crazy good by any means, but they could be improved upon. More so speaking of mesh, ham is its own mystery in my brain.

              Just examples really of networking outside of the normal infrastructure.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Okay yeah that was the impression I had too. I was excited when I first heard about it but from what I read it didn’t seem like you could do much with it. I’m still interested in playing around with it though if I find some free time. Ham didn’t really interest me as it requires a license which kind of defeats the purpose of this imo.

                • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Agreed on that front as well.

                  There has been some progress with data on meshtastic as well as range. For what it is in its current state, it’s still pretty awesome imo

          • Emi@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I assume unless they just make whitelist of sites you can connect to you can find workarounds.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The Internet is just a bunch of AS running open source protocols on commercially available infrastructure. It’s doing fine. The hosted commercial services might be fucked, but you can run your own.

      You’re using such a service right now.