North Carolina’s Michael Phillips revealed that he had a 0.38in member in bid to reduce stigma of the condition

  • BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Canconda’s original comment did not have the wiki link which is why I replied. Honestly, dropping 23 possible birthday pairs to reach >50% probability is still not intuitive to me.

    Of my OG friend group of ~12 there are two matching birthday pairs. One coincidental and one pair of twins which don’t count.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      29 minutes ago

      To grasp it intuitively, I think of it like this.

      With the first person, you have 1/365 chance the birthday will be on any given day.

      Each person you add to that adds not just another person but also another day that can be a match.

      After two people, you still don’t have a match but now you have two days. The third person can match either of those. That’s a lower bar than person #2 had to meet.

      After 15 people, the question is: “what are the odds that any two of you share any of these 15 days as your birthday.”

      See how this already sounds a little more likely than just narrowing in on “have the same birthday?” When it’s said that way it sounds like more of a bullseye than it truly is.

      So I think part of it is difficult to grasp intuitively, but it’s also phrased deliberately to throw off your intuition.