• floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Does the definition of VTOL not include the ability to transition to forward thrust? Looks cool but I’d just call it a multicopter

      • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The implied part of VTOL is that it’s only vertical for takeoff and landing, and otherwise primarily a horizontally propelled craft.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yes I do know that, but I am not aware of any aircraft that is “a VTOL” but only does vertical take off and landing

        • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          If it only did up and down then it wouldn’t be very practical or useful in most applications. There must be some sort of propulsion

          • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Tilting like helicopters and multicopters, you don’t need a dedicated directional thrust, just vectoring

        • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It does have some surfaces that look like they could produce lift.

          Traveling fast enough it could probably lose thrust and “land” horizontally… Until the legs grab and it tumbles.