• Spesknight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What if banning Linux is part of the Agenda? And what will they do for the servers? I am declaring my pc a server as of right now…

    • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      How do you want to do this? Linux is a kernel the world relies on. It powers your car, your fridge, your satellite, your phone, the entire Internet, the army, etc. Nothing comes close to Linux in market share. The distros are built upon the kernel. System76 may have to comply, but the other maintainers don’t give a flying fuck. They could even write a small line somewhere on their repo that says “this distro is not allowed in California” and call it a day.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I wonder if that “this distro is not allowed in California” approach is even compatible with the various free software licenses.

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Terms of Use / Terms of Service are different from Licenses. That said, even if it was compatible that would be a good thing, as the impression I’ve got is that the “hard-liner” Free Software licenses are becoming a thing of the past now that what is needed is “Ethical Source” licenses, that eg.: restrict usage in AI.