I posted this meme to the Lemmy Shitpost community. I reckoned that it might generate a bit of debate, and would probably end up locked, but the entire post got deleted, and moreover, I’m now forbidden from sharing political posts to the community. Political posts are not against the rules of the community.

I have reason to believe that the post was deleted not because it was controversial, but because the moderator (Decoy321) disagreed with the political slant of the meme. The reason I find this suspicious is because other controversial posts, such as one about veganism remains up, and Decoy321 seemed to enjoy the fact it was controversial:

    • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Intention exists, its just a form of information processing in your mind. Like all thoughts and motivations.

        • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Its not meaningless, at least not in a material sense. Trying to identify intent is useful information, it can guide interactions to being more empathetic/sympathetic, productive, or interesting.

          Is it meaningless in the sense of like, spirituality? Or existentialism? Absolutely. Like, we aren’t here for any reason and no one choose to be here. It never mattered in any mystical, magical, spiritual reason. There is nothing beyond what is here. We just exist and we like what we like and want what we want.

          • insurrection@mstdn.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            if it’s meaningless, why are you so focused on trying to define it and defend your position? you must recognize this is only rational if you have agency.

            • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Because I love discourse. I love discussing these ideas. (Though sometimes I also hate it)

              Agency is one’s ability to influence your environment. Agency feels good. So does solving puzzles and helping people.

              • insurrection@mstdn.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                if you’re not choosing how to change your environment, you have no agency. rock slides change their environment but they have no agency.

                • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Rocks have no agency because they aren’t conscious or contain intelligence.

                  Characters in books are fictional autonomous beings and are often described as having agency or having no agency on the basis of their level of influence on the story. That’s what I’m describing in a sense when I use the word, but applied to real conscious beings.

                  • insurrection@mstdn.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    consciousness doesn’t grant agency. free will does. if we can’t agree on this, then go on making up your own definitions.