• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s my bad for not remembering AMD’s fucking atrocious nonstandard mobile chip naming schemes.

    Atrocious compared to Intel? The first CPU with the name Core i7 was released in 2008, but Intel is still releasing a CPU named Core i7 as recently as 2023. They both suck, but in different ways.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly, we know where the root of this problem came from. Back in the 1990s Intel broke with convention of using ever increasing numeric model numbers

        • 8086
        • 8088
        • 80186
        • 80286
        • 80386
        • 80486
        • Pentium …wait, what?! Not 80586? Nope.

        Intel didn’t like that other CPU manufacturers of x86 CPUs (AMD, Cyrix, IBM) could use the same numbering scheme. So Intel created “Pentium” because it could be copyrighted/trademarked so other companies couldn’t use it.

        • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          There is no 80486. It’s called the i486.

          There is no CPU with a model number of Pentium. Intel’s flagship CPUs, in order, were:

          • 4004
          • 8008
          • 8080
          • 8085
          • 8086
          • 80186 (for less than a month; model number A80186)
          • 80286 (model number A80286)
          • 80386 (later renamed to i386; model number A80386)
          • i486 (model number A80486)
          • Pentium (model number A80500, A80501, A80502)

          The i386 and i486 had multiple variants with suffixes to the model number (the 486DX and DX2 are often mentioned), and then the Pentium had enough variants that they incremented the model number a couple of times and then changed it completely; Pentium Pro and later CPUs have completely different model numbers.

            • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              That’s a model number, not a name. The first Pentium had a model number of A80501, but you wouldn’t seriously claim that it’s really the 80501, would you?

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Read my prior post, I specifically SAID it was a model number.

                You’re embarrassing yourself with your pedantry. You said 80486 didn’t exist. It did. Seriously, quit while you’re behind here.

                • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Oops, my mistake, you were wrong about the Pentium, then, not the 486. Its model number, as I said, was A80501. You switched from model numbers to names.