• Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think a company in Europe doesn’t give a shit that the US government can peek at their data. Their users might care but they certainly don’t.

    What’s new is that they no longer trust the stability of the services long term. What if trump slaps a tariff, or asks Amazon to shut down access, or whatever bullshit passes through his head daily? You wouldn’t store your business on Russian servers, and they’re starting to realize the same applies to the US.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      They have to give s shit, because they are ultimately responsible for the handling (and abuse, if it comes to that) of the data, and as European companies they are in easy reach of the European law.

      • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah, as long as the actual servers are hosted in Europe, you’re compliant with GDPR and European law. The European company is not liable if the US government violates the EU-US framework.

        • biofaust@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The Processor is not, but the Controller is still required to guarantee appropriate security for personal data. Appropriate means running a risk assessment and deciding accordingly.

          The problem is when in the EU we take as security responsible for healthcare people who handled IAM for Jira tops.

          • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Appropriate means running a risk assessment and deciding accordingly

            The risk assessment doesn’t require the company to assess the reliability of international diplomatic relationships. Having your data on EU soil (even under the care of a US company) is enough for compliance.

            • biofaust@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I assure you that is not true. Even in my “mild” domain of marketing analytics, vendors exist that are EU companies with EU storage also run by EU companies or they offer on-premise deployment. And serious companies with users that may signal personal details through behavioral data seek such solutions.

              • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Vendors do exist but they are not required to do so. My last job was at a software vendor, GDPR compliant, ISO & SOC 2 certified, controlling personal data (including salary information) of EU citizens who were not opted in (their employer is the one on the contract). Not healthcare levels of sensitive but still pretty icky in terms of EU law and we had tons of German friends who are real sticklers for the rules. We stored everything on AWS infrastructure and it has never caused any issue during certification or security assessment by clients.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          European data on European servers is fine, as long as American agencies can’t just access data on those (which one cannot rule out with American companies).

          • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            There is no requirement for the company to think about that. The majority of GDPR-compliant companies still store on AWS/GCP, just on EU servers.