Support for violence to resist feminism was highest among adolescent boys (28%), followed closely by adolescent girls (21%).

Perhaps most alarming: roughly 40% of boys aged 13 to 17 agreed that women lie about domestic and sexual violence.

These results raise crucial questions going forward. We don’t yet know how these views have changed over time, whether they are on the rise and what the links are between violent extremism and the negative treatment of women.

  • Madrigal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just remember, folks, divide & conquer is the oldest trick in the book.

    They want us fighting the culture wars so we don’t fight the class war.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      The culture of misogyny vs the culture of “oh dear, we’re failing our kids and need to do better”?

      This is a stupid take.

      This is a peer-reviewed well-designed study by an expert in their field. Not a Ben Shapiro video.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 hours ago

        If it’s a peer-reviewed study, would you mind linking the actual study? Because it doesn’t seem to be published; i.e., hasn’t been peer-reviewed yet.

        If it’s well-designed, then surely the survey questions will stand up to scrutiny, correct?

      • Madrigal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The OP didn’t link to a peer-reviewed well-designed study. They linked to a “news” article that purports to relay the information from the study, but no doubt presents much of it out of context and to an audience who lack the expertise to really understand it.

        I was referring to men vs. women, or gays vs. straights, or residents vs. immigrants, or any one of the hundred other arbitrary divisions being constantly foisted onto us.

        The study may well be measuring these divisions, or their effects, but that’s not my point at all.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The Conversation is a well known resource for highly-factual and unbiased wording and phrasing in their material.

          Trying to frame them as a culture war peddler throwing “men vs. women” divisions to stoke flames is some bullshit.

          13578

          • sgnl@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Peak comment. Did you RTA? Because it does the opposite of what you propose, no factual evidence, and largely biased language.

            So…? We’re just supposed to take their word that the sky isn’t blue because in the past they’ve said the the sky is blue?