I would say it’s risky speaking that their C.O could ask about their “Personal activities” and pretty much get an unlimited investigation (national defense or court martial/etc) going on whatever organization you are a part of.
That’s one of the biggest reasons I recommend against organizing with military.
Generally, it draws attraction. It also depends on the organization. If you’re in a demsoc or a caucus of a demsoc; I suppose it could be alright. If you’re in a ML org; there might be some questions to raise there regarding what I said.
I would say it’s risky speaking that their C.O could ask about their “Personal activities” and pretty much get an unlimited investigation (national defense or court martial/etc) going on whatever organization you are a part of.
That’s one of the biggest reasons I recommend against organizing with military.
This is actually highly relevant to me and my organization. I think it’s reasonable but quite a lot of people do not agree
Generally, it draws attraction. It also depends on the organization. If you’re in a demsoc or a caucus of a demsoc; I suppose it could be alright. If you’re in a ML org; there might be some questions to raise there regarding what I said.
Well therein lies the question.
I would say no for ML orgs.
So would they it would seem as well lol
I think this text might be relevant: The Armed Forces and the Revolution by V. I. Lenin
Here is also something by S4A that would help (altho a frontend is needed): https://youtu.be/hgMQU47sA1U
I don’t agree that this analysis is entirely relevant to the military in the US as our currently functions. But i appreciate the links.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: