When women riders and drivers told us they wanted more control over how they ride and earn, we listened. That feedback led to Women Preferences, features designed to give women the choice to ride with other women. Since our first pilots last summer, we’ve heard just how much that choice matters—from feeling more comfortable in the back seat to more confident behind the wheel.

  • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Since a small number of men are creeps, we give you the option to avoid all men". Which seems to be counterproductive.

    Speaking as a man, the majority of men are creeps, but even if they weren’t, it wouldn’t be counterproductive. If it was, say, a 5% chance, one in twenty, that would be far and away high enough of a risk to make a move like this worthwhile. Hell even 1%. And we know the proportion is far greater than that.

    They know how many drives a customer has provisioned without incident.

    No they don’t, single digit percentages of sexual harassment are ever even reported let alone followed up because almost nobody gives a shit about it. Someone’s squeaky clean history is basically indistinguishable from that of a serial creep.

    How is that OK?

    Sadly, lots of things in the world aren’t ok. It’s tough out there.

    • mcv@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I wouldn’t mind if they’d implemented this the opposite way: if a woman, driver or passenger, encounters a creep, they could report that in the app and then the creep would automatically be banned from riding with women. That way decent men aren’t affected and women keep more choice in drivers/passengers, and only the creeps are singled out.

          • Velma@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            How else do you think women would be identifying creeps in your scenario?

            • mcv@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 minutes ago

              I think this rule a massive improvement, but I also think it’s very restrictive. Women can only choose to avoid all men, rather than just the creeps. So female drivers who need more passengers might feel forced to accept all men, and female passengers who can’t find a ride, might be forced to accept a ride from any male driver. Which might still be a creep.

              I think it’s better to weed out the creeps. I think that’s ultimately better for everybody. Make it harder for creeps to get a ride or passenger, instead of making it harder for women.

              Maybe both should be an option.

              • Velma@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 minutes ago

                Women riders are already forced to accept a ride from any male or female driver.

                How do women riders label male drivers as creeps? After they sexually assault or harass them? That’s what my question to you was - how does putting the onus on individual women riders to report creeps after they’ve done something creepy help those riders?

                I agree that there should be a way to report drivers. But you realize that already exists, right? So maybe we could just support more options for women to feel safer?