• org@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Joke’s on them. Mine is a Chinese company. I already know it spies on me. So does my car with its “disabled” cell connection that promises not to broadcast my whereabouts.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      So does my car with its “disabled” cell connection that promises not to broadcast my whereabouts.

      Find the antenna and physically unplug it.

    • Sheridan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve been shopping for a dash cam. It seems like all the brands are Chinese companies except Garmin?

      • org@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I wouldn’t worry about it too much. You can get some without WiFi. You just have to yank the microsd if you want to see the files. The one I have has WiFi but it’s so slow I can’t even preview videos. I have to connect to its WiFi, so unless it’s randomly connecting to open WiFi’s while I’m driving without my knowledge, I can’t see how it would transit much.

        Don’t spend too much though. They break after a couple years. Especially if you live in a hot climate like a desert.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah. If you get one that only records to an SD card and has no wireless connections of any kind, it would be pretty hard for that to have any security/privacy concerns.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      that’s fine, if you only use it on private roads. but if not, you are recording plenty of people (even not counting drivers) who did not consent to being recorded.
      then who knows what happens with the recordings. and that’s the actual problem.

      too bad its not enforced.

      • uselessartifact@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Speaking as someone from the US, consent is not required to record someone in public.

        “There is no responsible expectation of privacy while in public.”

        If you don’t want to be recorded by people at random, stay home.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          in civilized countries consent is required for that

          If you don’t want to be recorded by people at random, stay home. you are free to die

          • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            It’s the same in most of Europe afaik. You can’t be filmed as a primary subject without consent. For example, I can photograph you in the background of a monument or in nature, without having to ask your consent.
            It’s the same for dashcams, you are filming the road primarily not the pedestrian.

            Edit: even better, in France (and iirc in Belgium too) I can photograph you as a primary subject without consent, but I cannot reproduce or distribute the picture of you without your consent.
            Look up “Droit à l’image” if you want to know more.
            Edit2: Hungary seems to have laws like I initially described, so taking pictures of videos in public should be okay as long as more than 1 person is visible on it.

            • uselessartifact@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              To be fair, if you’re intentionally only filming one specific person, I’m sure they could claim harassment at some point. Maybe public disturbance or nuisance?