• Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Yes prohibition of alcohol worked so well in America, the 18th amendment, in the 1919 that 14 years later they repealed it, the 21st amendment.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If the goal was to reduce alcohol consumption then it was successful at that. I’m not saying it didn’t cause other issues, and it was decided that it wasn’t worth it, but it did not fail at the intended goal of reducing alcohol consumption.

    • Nikelui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They should adopt the same approach they use in Sweden to fight alcoholism: tax the hell out of it. You won a million by doing “insider trading” on the most recent dumb government decision? Congratulations, you owe the IRS half a mil.

      • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Well what is the difference? A vice is a vice. Both are used to distracte us from the daily life of contant reminder that we are just a flesh bag being controlled by a mass of fat that will decay and die at some point. While we circle around a massive black hole. So why is this one vice so different that you think that prohibition would work?