• voluble@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    207
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “If GrapheneOS devices can’t be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it.”

    Wonder if Motorola feels the same way.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      1 day ago

      They can just sell their normal phone. As long as the user is able to run the installer it doesn’t really matter.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        During prohibition era, there was a brick of dried grapes being sold as a nutrition supplement or something like that, but it had a “warning” sticker attached saying specifically not to dissolve it in a specific quantity of water, and if that were to happen, do not let a specific quantity of yeast to fall in it, and especially not to let it sit for 6 weeks, or else you might end up with wine, which is forbidden!

        I can see a cheeky sort of company selling a phone with a little warning label attached to it…

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          21 hours ago

          mandatory age verifications on the OS isn’t a viable economic decision either, but that’s not stopping Media Matters and Meta from forcing their shitty anti-privacy policies on citizens.

        • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          63
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          If you can’t open chrome on a pc, connect an android phone to it, and use a simple web tool you’re probably not capable of any actual level of digital privacy.

          This isn’t me being elitist its just the fact that the resources needed to make this shit viable and easy are being tied up to corporations in order to make more easy-to-use corporate spyware.

          Privacy under fascism takes time, effort, and education. Stop fucking expecting it to be OOTB. Society is literally engineered against that. Its not a reasonable ask of open source devs making privacy tools.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            What else can those who value privacy and have computer skills do but try to be a good example and offer to help to those around them without the know-how?

            • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink, especially not when you barely have time in the day to take a drink yourself.

              If someone doesn’t have time or will to put privacy over convenience that’s kind of their gig. It sucks but like I can’t fuckin’ change their life schedule/priorities.

              I spend enough time documenting and working in my homelab, I don’t need other people’s too. I’ll be happy to point people towards information and documentation, but that’s about it.

              However if you’re not willing to:

              1. bury your nose in multiple wikis
              2. change out the OS on nearly every general purpose computing device you own
              3. Live most of your online life anonymously/pseudononymously
              4. Run a homelab (technically not required but makes life nicer)

              You should stop while you’re ahead.

              If you have kids I have no fucking clue how you’d even begin.

              At that point you’re installing rootkit anticheat just to get little johnny playing games with their friends, fucking nightmare scenario.

              • tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 minutes ago

                Big tech has their claws deep into education and I don’t see that changing. Parts of the world see school shootings happen, a more obvious problem than lack of software freedom/privacy, but do not think that’s bad enough to change. Having children right now may be a bad idea.

                I’ve already distanced myself by deleted most (big-tech) social media platforms. Currently trying to ditch Discord but I don’t see friends do the same. Stopping now may look like a good idea but the ick would remain.

                When things really matter all we have is words or violence. I have no choice but to hope that good ideas win in the end, and that the world improves over time. Just be the best you can.

        • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          If they ship with Android but confirm that GrapheneOS works, those who even know of GrapheneOS’s existence will put in the effort to install it themselves. It’s totally viable and a simple plan.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That’s probably not a viable economic decision though

          Should still be a good deal for Motorola. There’s a bunch of folks now who buy whatever phone runs GrapheneOS best. Whichever company courts us gets our business.

          I’m sure we’re not a landslide, but sometimes niche communities can still make a huge difference for a company.

          • Lemmyng@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Hi, yes, it’s me, I’m one of those bunch of folks who would willingly switch off Google’s Tensor crap modem to ideally a Motorola phone with a Qualcomm modem that can run Graphene.

        • Aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I believe the US and Brazil are the only countries in the world forcing age verification. They chose to pull their infrastructure out of France bit there is no ban on the sale of devices with it installed.

          • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Germany has been discussing this for a while now. So are other EU states.

            It’s always the same. “We need to catch the pedophiles, end e2e” or “the Internet is not a lawless space, give us id”.

          • 0x0@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It’d be pretty naive to assume that other countries wont follow.

            • Aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I doubt Lenovo (Motorola) would commit to selling mobiles with gOS preinstalled if they really thought there was a threat to their sales.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Imagine if California then declared a ban on the sale of GrapheneOS compatible phones.

      would be fun to see.