That this has over 700 upvotes on lemmy.world says everything you need to know about lemmy.world.
You see it turns out you can have more than 1 thought in your head at once. Trump can be a fascist who materially supports a genocide and the democrat party can also be materially supporting a genocide. Look at how little they’ve done to stop the Iran war. Why do you think that is?
And the Democrats couldn’t even do a symbolic vote? Or force everyone to a war resolution vote so that they’re on record and politically toxic when this whole thing collapses?
The only way to “punish” the Democrats at the time this post was written was to allow Trump to be elected. The OP was advocating that Americans attempt to stop a genocide by performing an action that would make the genocide worse. There were only two candidates in the race with even the remotest chance of winning: Harris and Trump. If the poster hoped Harris would lose then she hoped Trump would win.
Ah, the old false narrative of binary choice. Fun fact: You can vote for anyone, even if they’re not displayed (via write-in). Yeah, statistically anyone other than the anointed two will probably lose, unless enough people make the same decision, which actually does exist as a possibility because the two parties did not write the rules of reality, they just influenced things in their favor.
But of course, the Democrats can never fail, they can only be failed. Republicans fear their constituents, democrats hate theirs.
Don’t most people do that? I’d say any mainstream attempt to turn the upvote-downvote system into anything other than like-dislike is doomed to fail. We need a second pair of arrows for “worth reading” vs “don’t bother”
That this has over 700 upvotes on lemmy.world says everything you need to know about lemmy.world.
You see it turns out you can have more than 1 thought in your head at once. Trump can be a fascist who materially supports a genocide and the democrat party can also be materially supporting a genocide. Look at how little they’ve done to stop the Iran war. Why do you think that is?
Idk, it might be the fact that Republicans control all 3 branches of the government.
And the Democrats couldn’t even do a symbolic vote? Or force everyone to a war resolution vote so that they’re on record and politically toxic when this whole thing collapses?
I
hathate MAGA as much as anyone who has more than one braincell, but no; the Dems couldn’t force water through a straw.Not an argument, they do nothing when they control the government too
If you phrase it that way, they’ll take it as permission.
👨🚀🔫👨🚀
The only way to “punish” the Democrats at the time this post was written was to allow Trump to be elected. The OP was advocating that Americans attempt to stop a genocide by performing an action that would make the genocide worse. There were only two candidates in the race with even the remotest chance of winning: Harris and Trump. If the poster hoped Harris would lose then she hoped Trump would win.
Which is absurd. Centrists don’t see a continuation of their only policy as a loss. They see it as an opportunity to blame the left and nothing else.
Ah, the old false narrative of binary choice. Fun fact: You can vote for anyone, even if they’re not displayed (via write-in). Yeah, statistically anyone other than the anointed two will probably lose, unless enough people make the same decision, which actually does exist as a possibility because the two parties did not write the rules of reality, they just influenced things in their favor.
But of course, the Democrats can never fail, they can only be failed. Republicans fear their constituents, democrats hate theirs.
Okay, but how are you going to coordinate 100+ million voters to vote for the same candidate so they actually win?
Well i guess that worked out swimmingly for her and her kind, lofl.
Wait, tankies are so brainwashed in their echo chamber, they objectively confuse “worth reading” with “approve”?
Don’t most people do that? I’d say any mainstream attempt to turn the upvote-downvote system into anything other than like-dislike is doomed to fail. We need a second pair of arrows for “worth reading” vs “don’t bother”
piefed already has reactions for “dis/like, dis/approve, a/vow” etc…
voting has always been a signal for “un/worth reading”
Who untaught tankie instances otherwise‽
Sounds like yet another reason for me to consider switching to piefed sooner rather than later.
🤝
I just need to emigrate first, b4 I make my piefed×jabber service. I have a
quokk.auaccount already, thanks to them allowing antifa praxis.SDF is down for me to make my appeals to blåhaj