commander@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoSomeone finally did it: a high-end TV with a DisplayPort connection actually is coming this year, including 4K 180Hz supportwww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1924arrow-down115
arrow-up1909arrow-down1external-linkSomeone finally did it: a high-end TV with a DisplayPort connection actually is coming this year, including 4K 180Hz supportwww.techradar.comcommander@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square147fedilink
minus-squareBygoneNeutrino@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·18 hours agoDoes anything useful even come in 8K at this point? I saw it as a spec last time I went television shopping, but it seemed like something that wouldn’t be useful for another decade.
minus-squarearcine@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·14 hours ago8K was always a lie. It’s impossible to tell the difference from 4K unless you’re too close, 4K already has more pixels than your eyes do.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 hours ago4k is about 8 million pixels. The human eye has a resolution of about 576 million “pixels” . I know what you mean with your comment, but the way you expressed it is factually incorrect
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoI think it’s already the case for 1080p at the distance most people put their TV.
minus-squareswab148@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·13 hours agoTechnically, all TVs have more pixels than your eyes do
Does anything useful even come in 8K at this point? I saw it as a spec last time I went television shopping, but it seemed like something that wouldn’t be useful for another decade.
8k is effectively dead
8K was always a lie. It’s impossible to tell the difference from 4K unless you’re too close, 4K already has more pixels than your eyes do.
4k is about 8 million pixels. The human eye has a resolution of about 576 million “pixels” .
I know what you mean with your comment, but the way you expressed it is factually incorrect
I think it’s already the case for 1080p at the distance most people put their TV.
Technically, all TVs have more pixels than your eyes do