schizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago'It doesn’t catch fire': Why China’s "fireproof" sodium battery could be the breakthrough that makes EVs safer than ICE carswww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up1657arrow-down131file-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up1626arrow-down1external-link'It doesn’t catch fire': Why China’s "fireproof" sodium battery could be the breakthrough that makes EVs safer than ICE carswww.techradar.comschizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square192fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·1 day agoDo you usually post links without reading them? Interestingly, the study attributes the problems to the drivers not the cars. Because aside from random catastrophic failure, the vehicle doesn’t make you cash. The driver or Tesla’s “self-driving” does
minus-squareBad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·19 hours agoBad drivers and shitty “self driving” are how the cars are unsafe. No matter how it happens if they crash more often or have worse outcomes when they do, then they’re less safe.
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 hours agoIs this a bit account? Should the name have clued me in?
minus-squarehitmyspot@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agoNo, that’s not the same thing. Something being used in a more dangerous way doesn’t make it more dangerous or more unsafe. Driving a car at speed along a cliff in the dark in the rain is more unsafe than driving it slowly in an empty car park. It’s the same car.
minus-squareBad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoIf I included a self destruct button beside the AC controls and claimed that it was driver error that was the problem, how credible would that be?
minus-squarehitmyspot@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoThat would be an unsafe car in all conditions and with all drivers. Sure, user error would play a part but a reasonable person could still cause a problem. Perhaps a better analogy will make a useful point. Is there a button for that?
Do you usually post links without reading them?
Because aside from random catastrophic failure, the vehicle doesn’t make you cash. The driver or Tesla’s “self-driving” does
Bad drivers and shitty “self driving” are how the cars are unsafe.
No matter how it happens if they crash more often or have worse outcomes when they do, then they’re less safe.
Is this a bit account? Should the name have clued me in?
No, that’s not the same thing. Something being used in a more dangerous way doesn’t make it more dangerous or more unsafe.
Driving a car at speed along a cliff in the dark in the rain is more unsafe than driving it slowly in an empty car park. It’s the same car.
If I included a self destruct button beside the AC controls and claimed that it was driver error that was the problem, how credible would that be?
That would be an unsafe car in all conditions and with all drivers. Sure, user error would play a part but a reasonable person could still cause a problem.
Perhaps a better analogy will make a useful point. Is there a button for that?