• Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Public support fractures if the questions are broken down into more detail. People have unfounded fears of new “death panels”, and founded fears of the government screwing up implementation (Canada has crazy wait times for many medical services - it’s an outlier among developed countries, but demonstrates the screw-up opportunity). People support new services if they are funded magically, but aren’t willing to support tax raises, even though the tax increases would be less than the savings from not paying for private health insurance.

    The complexity - and partisan politicians being more than willing to weaponize confusion over details to divide us against each other - is the barrier.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I’m not an economist, but I bet if we cut the military budget to match that of ANY OTHER developed nation we could manage the healthcare costs.

      We don’t require 8x the military budget of anywhere else on Earth

      Want a compromise? Sure, let’s restrict our budget to the combined top competing THREE NATIONS.

      (on checking a couple sources, the math even checks out, and we’d STILL have the most powerful military in the world)

      It’s not that complex. One old-fashioned fireside chat will do it, it’s pretty obvious. We have DECADES of universal healthcare data and results, it’s not some new, radical, alien thing.

      Just provide Americans with real data. Presidents don’t HAVE to be babbling idiots, there’s another way!