Scientific innovation has been driving US economic growth for decades. Losing that edge means losing access to the technologies and brainpower that come with it.
Clinton doubled the NIH budget in his tenure and even moved DARPA money into biomedical research. >$20B a year more spending, but it did not translate to more success in diseases research.
The Clinton era proved just spending more does not equal better science.
What are you referring to? Im not American and Clinton was before my time
Clinton doubled the NIH budget in his tenure and even moved DARPA money into biomedical research. >$20B a year more spending, but it did not translate to more success in diseases research.