Some arguments in the thread was that this was some bullshit rumour that was started by neo-nazi admins of dbzer0.com or from some .ml instances.

It’s easy to point fingers and make up rumours, but this is a genuine concern. Whether it’s at lemmy.world or dbzer0.com or anywhere else.

This is the responsibility of the communities to call these people out. Whether they are neo-nazis or zionists, it doesn’t matter. They should not be moderating any instances.

Finally, if there is any real proof of this, can people share it here? Like posts, comments, modlogs?

  • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    “A Fediverse community for open-ended thought provoking questions”

    (my emphasis)

    It’s literally the first sentence on the side bar for that community.


    “An open-ended question is a questionthat cannot be answered with a “yes” or “no” response, or with a static response. Open-ended questions are phrased as a statement which requires a longer answer.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-ended_question

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Looking at the community, the rule is not enforced. There are other not open-ended questions up and doing fine. At best, assuming this is intended to be enforced, it’s being enforced selectively.

      Assuming you’re being perfectly honest and fair, this rule should be changed. Questions that require elaboration from “yes/no” should be (and are seemingly) allowed. Sure, questions that can only be answered with a “yes/no” aren’t providing a discussion. The trolley problem, for example, can be answered with a yes or no, but invites people to expand on why.