PS. This is not a critique to Debian-based distros. And i’m not suggesting you to skip Ubintu for Arch either. Arch is a bit advanced and not too easy to new users, so that won’t do for some people…

… just install Linux Mint instead.

    • ramasses@social.ozymandias.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As someone who uses arch, its just stability. Arch is great for a hobby, if you want to do work, use fedora. Its so much simpler. That being said, I love arch because of the tinkering, and that lack of tinkering is why I switched off fedora.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        I “do work” just fine on Arch but maybe I’ve just gotten used to the quirks and the DIY aspect of it. None of it is an obstacle to productivity anymore.

        I do realize I’m not the average person and am some kind of freak that likes to take working stuff apart and put it back together for funsies.

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            That’s what I’m trying to say though, I’m at the point to where it’s not a waste of time for me because I know immediately what to do if something goes wrong or I need to make some sort of config change or install/remove software. I’m no longer “tinkering” with it, I’m using it. It’s just as fast for me as it is for someone on a more “user friendly” OS.

            In other words, I have scaled most of the learning curve cliff.

        • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Fedora is an odd choice if you’re looking for stability. It’s a rolling distro. Some rolling distros are fairly stable but fedora updates constantly broke my shit.

          Debian or opensuse leap are where it’s at for pure stability. Or any other LTS distro, really

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      When you want to do work on the OS instead of working on the OS. Arch was a fun learning experience but eventually an nvidia driver or something shit the bed on me and I never went back. Outsource the unit testing to others. Fedora still has very new packages and you can still roll from release to release. Even better if you’re using one of the Fedora Atomic flavors.

      • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I was waiting for Syncthing 2 for like half a year. It’s yesterday when I’ve got it. All my other Arch machines have it for a very long time.

        • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Could always just use anything like that in distrobox.

          Just saying because I too want stuff to just work and fedora does but still gives you access to new stuff like that in other ways.

          • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah, thanks! I think I’d try something like that some other time, as this time I didn’t know there are options. Here on Lemmy, someone mentioned that Synching self-updates if you just drop it somewhere on your disk. (Pretty cool!)

            I do enjoy Fedora a lot, but on shared machines. For my own machines, I prefer to tinker a lot, and build my own, depending on what I need. Since that’s quite easy once you’re past some point, why not, right?