French activists staged a funeral for Windows 10 to protest Microsoft’s push toward Windows 11 and planned obsolescence.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    How does an “archaic” high-end Ryzen computer compare to your average Windows 11 enabled $400 Walmart computer today?


    Update

    Compatible: Trash Walmart best-seller in 500 carts

    HP 14 inch HD Windows Laptop
    2-Core AMD Athlon 7120
    4GB RAM
    128GB SSD

    Incompatible: Dell XPS 13 (late 2017)

    1.8GHz Intel Core i7-8550U
    8GB DDR4 SDRAM 1,866MHz
    256GB PCIe SSD

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      For what it’s worth, I have a system with first-gen Zen cores (Threadripper 1900X). 8 cores at 3.8GHz. Not too shabby even now. It’s just got a higher power draw than the newer chips. Got a fairly decent price on it on Black Friday of 2017. (Never ran Windows on it, though.)

    • Attacker94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My desktop which is running a i7-6700k from 2015 out performs all of the <$400 laptops that I could find on every metric and had higher multi core but lower single core for the $400-$600 range. I was unable to find a desktop that was <$800 that was better, so I would surmize that the desktop market won’t have a meaningful price/performance % in comparison to the laptops. At the very least with the insanity of graphics & memory prices at the moment, the budget systems are getting smoked by a desktop from 2015, even while purposefully omitting the 2070 I have because that was a newer addition and pretty much all of the systems are running poor quality integrated graphics anyway.