• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    How can you outlaw something a company in another conhtinent is doing? And specially when they are becoming better as disguising themselves as normal traffic? What will happen is that politicians will see this as another reason to push for everyone having their ID associated with their Internet traffic.

    • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What will happen is that politicians will see this as another reason to push for everyone having their ID associated with their Internet traffic.

      You’re right. Which is exactly why companies should be exhibiting better behaviour and self regulate before they make the internet infinitely worse off for everyone.

      • big_slap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        self regulation is a joke. a few bad apples always spoil the bunch.

        what needs to happen is regulation, period. force all companies to abide by laws that just make sense, and all these problems go away.

        see: GDPR

        • oldfart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          What did GDPR solve? Did we get rid of advertisers sharing data?

          • big_slap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            nope, but now we are aware of how many times our data is shared with because of it.

            here’s a short breakdown of what it has accomplished:

            The GDPR lists six data processing principles that data controllers must comply with. Personal data must be:

            Processed lawfully, fairly and transparently.
            Collected only for specific legitimate purposes.
            Adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary.
            Accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date.
            Stored only as long as is necessary.
            Processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security.
            

            Lawful processing

            Except for special categories of personal data, which cannot be processed except under certain circumstances, personal data can only be processed:

            If the data subject has given their consent;
            To meet contractual obligations;
            To comply with legal obligations;
            To protect the data subject’s vital interests;
            For tasks in the public interest; and
            For the legitimate interests of the organisation.
            

            Data subjects’ rights

            Data subjects have:

            The right to be informed;
            The right of access;
            The right to rectification;
            The right to erasure;
            The right to restrict processing;
            The right to data portability;
            The right to object; and
            Rights concerning automated decision-making and profiling.
            

            Learn how to map your data and establish a lawful basis for processing Valid consent

            There are stricter rules regarding consent:

            Consent must be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous.
            A request for consent must be intelligible and in clear, plain language.
            Silence, pre-ticked boxes and inactivity will no longer suffice as consent.
            Consent can be withdrawn at any time.
            Consent for online services from a child is only valid with parental authorisation.
            Organisations must be able to evidence consent.
            

            Data protection by design and by default

            Data controllers and processors must implement technical and organisational measures that are designed to implement the data processing principles effectively.

            Appropriate safeguards should be integrated into the processing.
            Data protection must be considered at the design stage of any new process, system or technology.
            A DPIA (data protection impact assessment) is an integral part of privacy by design.
            

            Transparency and privacy notices

            Organisations must be clear about how, why and by whom personal data will be processed.

            When personal data is collected directly from data subjects, data controllers must provide a privacy notice at the time of collection.
            When personal data is not obtained directly from data subjects, data controllers must provide a privacy notice without undue delay, and within a month. This must be done the first time they communicate with the data subject.
            For all processing activities, data controllers must decide how the data subjects will be informed, and design privacy notices accordingly. Notices can be issued in stages.
            Privacy notices must be provided to data subjects in a concise, transparent and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language.
            

            Data transfers outside the EU

            Where the EU has designated a country as providing an adequate level of data protection;
            Through standard contractual clauses or binding corporate rules; or
            By complying with an approved certification mechanism.
            

            Many non-EU organisations that process EU residents’ personal data also need to appoint an EU representative following the end of the transition period. Mandatory data breach notification

            The GDPR defines a personal data breach as “a breach of security leading to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure of, or access to, personal data transmitted, stored or otherwise processed”.

            Data processors are required to report all breaches of personal data to data controllers.
            Data controllers are required to report breaches to the supervisory authority (the Data Protection Commission (DPC) in Ireland) within 72 hours of becoming aware of them if there is a risk to data subjects’ rights and freedoms.
            Data subjects themselves must be notified without undue delay if there is a high risk to their rights and freedoms.
            

            DPOs (data protection officers)

            You must be able to demonstrate compliance with the GDPR. This includes:

            Establishing a governance structure with roles and responsibilities;
            Keeping a detailed record of all data processing operations;
            Documenting data protection policies and procedures;
            Carrying out DPIAs (data protection impact assessments) for high-risk processing operations; Learn more about DPIAs
            Implementing appropriate measures to secure personal data;
            Conducting staff awareness training; and
            Where required, appointing a data protection officer.
            
            • gigglybastard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              that sounds great in theory but a) noone respects this and b) noone enforces this

              i know because i reported a bunch of companies and websites and every time i got a reply “welp, there’s nothing we can do”

              GDRP is useless

              • big_slap@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                a) noone respects this

                well, the websites I frequent always ask me if I want to allow for tracking cookies ever since GDPR was implemented. I think it worked for websites that want to comply with the law.

                also, that’s disappointing to hear about them not taking action on companies that don’t comply. you went through the whole process several times? which country are you located in? I’m just curious 🙂

            • oldfart@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              So now the adtech companies need to hire a minimum wage person in the EU, and I can write them a letter requesting they remove my anonimized data, doxxing myself in the process. Oh and now I know they’re sharing with 395 partners, as if that wasn’t obvious from uBlock before. And I get to sign a permission to process my data if I want to see a doctor.

      • fjordo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Exactly, we’ve already seen this in the past. GDPR is a good example. Whilst I’m glad this regulation exists, it wouldn’t be necessary if megacorps would have behaved.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      What will happen is that politicians will see this as another reason to push for everyone having their ID associated with their Internet traffic.

      Yes, because like or not that’s the only possible solution. If all traffic was required to be signed and the signatures were tied to an entity then you could refuse unsigned traffic and if signed traffic was causing problems you’d know who it was and have recourse.

      I don’t like this solution but it’s the only way forward that I can see.

      • trougnouf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        How do you have more recourse countering a random third world IP vs a random third world person when both are outside your juridiction?

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          PoW has the advantage of being anonymous but I don’t like it as solution for the simple fact that it uses more electricity. It’s just not a very green solution.

          • iarigby@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            it doesn’t have to be only meaningless computations. And even if it were, the cost is nothing compared to such a huge scale of privacy infringement